Legal Opinion

Lino v. N.W. Pac. R. R. Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1928No. 18685. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendants in error, Andrew Lino and Lee W. Wolfe, began an action of assumpsit in the circuit court of Cook county against plaintiff in error, the Northwestern Pacific Railroad Company, to recover the value of 930 lugs of grapes shipped from Ross, California, to Summerville, Massachusetts, and re-consigned in transit at Chicago to Akron, Ohio. Plaintiff in error filed the general issue, with notice of special matters relied on for defense. A jury was waived. It was agreed that if there was any liability the damages were $800. The court found against plaintiff in error, judgment was entered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Sabine Tram Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Myrick v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert F. Watterson v. New York Central Railroad Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  2. Hartford Live Stock Insurance v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  3. Riss & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API