Legal Opinion

Jacobsen v. Oliver

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 16, 2008No. Civil Action 01-1810(PLF)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This attorneys’ fees dispute arises out of the successful representation of plaintiff David Jacobsen by his former attorneys, James J. Oliver, Carla E. Connor and Barbara A. Barnes, and their law firm, Murphy, Oliver, Caiola & Gowen P.C. (collectively, “defendants”) in two actions against the Islamic Republic of Iran. The matter came before the Court on two motions for summary judgment: one on behalf of Mr. Oliver, Ms. Connor and Ms. Barnes (the “individual defendants”), and one on behalf of Murphy, Oliver, Caiola & Gowen P.C. (the “law firm”). 1 The…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Berra v. SPRINGER AND STEINBERG, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Demery v. Montgomery County, Md.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Koch v. SchapiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Howard University v. WatkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Hickey v. ScottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API