Legal Opinion

Furst Kerber Cut Stone Co. v. Mayo

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1924No. 11,969PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.

Forest Mayo was employed by appellant as a quarryman, and during the afternoon of November 27,1922, with a number of coemployes, was engaged in moving and placing a track over which a channeling machine was operated. In the group of men doing the work was Everett Mayo, a brother of Forest, and Noble Watson. At the noon or lunch hour, Everett Mayo and Watson had quarreled over a trivial matter. About an hour and a half after work had been resumed following the lunch period, and after the quarrel between Everett Mayo and Watson had ended, Watson complained to Everett that he was not doing his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hinchuk v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Townsend & Freeman Co. v. TaggartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Mueller v. KlingmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Payne v. WallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baker v. WESTINGHOUSE ELEC. CORP. & MONSANTO CO.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Cunningham v. Aluminum Co. of America, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Keithley v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Thompson v. J. A. Jones Const. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  5. Tippmann v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API