Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Naber

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 25, 1974No. Patent Appeal No. 9192PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision by the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-6, 8-10, 12, and 13 — all the claims in application serial No. 842,025, filed July 15, 1969, for “Process for Regeneration of Sulfur Oxide Acceptors.” We reverse.

THE INVENTION

Sulfur oxides are removed from gas mixtures, such as flue gases and gases originating from roasting processes, by contact with metal or metal oxide acceptors, such as copper or copper oxide, on a refractory carrier material (e. g., alumina). During contact, sulfur…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In re MurchCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. Application of Sigurd I. LindellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Application of Sol D. Gershon, Melvin A. Goldberg and Oscar W. NeiditchCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Application of James R. Tiffin and Earl ErdmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. In re NaberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API