Securities and Exchange Commission v. One or More Unknown Traders in the Common Stock of Certain Issuers
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Plaintiff’s Motion for Disgorgement; Denying Parex’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting Parex’s Alternative Request to Unfreeze $1,164,-652.07
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on both the plaintiffs motion for disgorge ment and the relief defendant \ JSC Parex Bank, Inc.’s (“Parex”), motion for summary judgment. The defendants are four individuals who reaped substantial profits by engaging in illegal trading on the U.S. stock market. They carried out this illegal activity using…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Casper Eugene Harding v. Vincent GrayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Dennis Diamond, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Brian Atwood, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Arrington, Derreck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LoomisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014