Legal Opinion
Emil Salamey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 28, 1984No. 83-1414PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (Aet-na) appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff Emil Salamey for breach of a contract for fire insurance. On appeal, Aetna argues that the District Court erred in excluding certain evidence of motive and in awarding excessive damages for lost profits. We find that the trial court committed no error, and affirm.
Emil Salamey owned a convenience store in Bay City, Michigan, which was destroyed by fire in September 1980. Salamey had fire insurance coverage for the store from the defendant Aetna. In January 1981, Aetna denied Salamey's claim on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Beautytuft, Inc., Jorges Carpet Mills, Inc., and Moccasin Bend Carpet Mills, Inc. v. Factory Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Lorenz Supply Co. v. American Standard, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Oritani Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Royal College Shop, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, and Thomas H. Black, Cross-Appellees v. Northern Insurance Co. Of N.Y., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FreyerMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- James D. Murphy and Rosemary Murphy v. The Cincinnati Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Shathaia v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.