Legal Opinion

Ashland v. Lapiner Motor Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 6, 1956No. 48842PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

In January 1950 the Lapiner Motor Company, a corporation, sold to plaintiff a Cadillac car under a conditional sales contract, and as a down payment took a chattel mortgage on his Chevrolet pickup truck. In January 1951 Nate Lapiner, an officer and stockholder of the corporation, caused a writ of replevin to issue for the recovery of both cars, plaintiff being in arrears in his payments. George G. Dunn, an attorney, handled the proceedings. A deputy sheriff, with the writ of replevin, contacted the plaintiff, told him he had a writ of replevin and inquired as to the whereabouts of the ears.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Turner v. Zip Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. Stephenson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Sergeant v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  4. Hall v. Field Enterprises, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Schnathorst v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Northrup v. Miles Homes, Inc. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Briner v. HyslopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Children v. BurtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Mayrath Company v. HelgesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Sarvold v. DodsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API