Legal Opinion

Sarvold v. Dodson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 21, 1976No. 2-57067PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff appeals dismissal of Count (Division) I of his petition for failure to state a cause of action for abuse of process. We find the trial court applied the wrong rule of law in sustaining defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s Count I and accordingly reverse and remand.

I. Count I of plaintiff’s three Count petition alleges a cause of action for abuse of process, Count II alleges a cause of action for malicious prosecution and Count III alleges a cause of action for a civil rights violation. Defendant’s motion to dismiss each Count for failure to plead a cause of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Maniaci v. Marquette UniversityWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Aalfs v. AalfsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Hyde Construction Co., Inc. v. Koehring CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1974
  4. Nix v. GoodhillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. Bohm v. HolzbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Bickel v. MacKieDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1978
  3. Schmidt v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Wilson v. HayesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Cutler v. Klass, Whicher & MishneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API