Sarvold v. Dodson
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff appeals dismissal of Count (Division) I of his petition for failure to state a cause of action for abuse of process. We find the trial court applied the wrong rule of law in sustaining defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s Count I and accordingly reverse and remand.
I. Count I of plaintiff’s three Count petition alleges a cause of action for abuse of process, Count II alleges a cause of action for malicious prosecution and Count III alleges a cause of action for a civil rights violation. Defendant’s motion to dismiss each Count for failure to plead a cause of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Maniaci v. Marquette UniversityWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Aalfs v. AalfsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Hyde Construction Co., Inc. v. Koehring CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1974
- Nix v. GoodhillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Bohm v. HolzbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Bickel v. MacKieDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1978
- Schmidt v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Wilson v. HayesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Cutler v. Klass, Whicher & MishneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.