United States v. Darrell H. Strouse James R. Willis
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
A federal grand jury indicted Darrell Strouse and James Willis, both formerly of the Houston Police Department, for conspiring to violate the civil rights of Rogelio Oregon Pineda and Pedro Oregon Navarro in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241. The district court dismissed the indictment because Pineda’s1 testimony before the grand jury was perjurious, and, according to the district court, tainted the grand jury’s decision to indict the Defendants. We hold that perjury before the grand jury that was not knowingly sponsored by the government may not form the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pineda v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Francisco Colorado CessaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. NaegeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States v. UrquidiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.