Legal Opinion
Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. v. Burlington Northern Railroad
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 31, 1984No. Civ. 3-84-124PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MAGNUSON, District Judge.
A hearing was held before the undersigned on February 10, 1984 upon the motion of defendant Burlington Northern Railroad Company for an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). In the alternative, defendant has moved for summary judgment on the following grounds: 1) that plaintiff Reilly Tar is not entitled to the equitable relief sought due to its unlawful trespass on defendant’s property; and 2) that the plaintiff has not met the requisite elements entitling them to a bill of discovery in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Robert E. Hedberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State of Colo. v. Asarco, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- Lubrin v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1986
- Bergstrom v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1995
- Webb v. Joyce Real Estate, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Temple v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.