Pullman Arms, Inc. v. Maura Healey, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) PULLMAN ARMS, INC, et al., ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION ) NO. 16-40136-TSH MAURA HEALEY, ATTORNEY ) GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH ) OF MASSACHUSETTS ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH August 13, 2019 Hennessy, M.J. By order of reference dated August 2, 2019, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), (Docket #90), this matter was referred to me for a ruling on the Defendant Attorney General Maura Healey’s motion to quash, (Docket #85). This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons that follow, the motion to quash is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.