Legal Opinion

Pullman Arms, Inc. v. Maura Healey, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 13, 2019No. 4:16-cv-40136Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) PULLMAN ARMS, INC, et al., ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION ) NO. 16-40136-TSH MAURA HEALEY, ATTORNEY ) GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH ) OF MASSACHUSETTS ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH August 13, 2019 Hennessy, M.J. By order of reference dated August 2, 2019, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), (Docket #90), this matter was referred to me for a ruling on the Defendant Attorney General Maura Healey’s motion to quash, (Docket #85). This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons that follow, the motion to quash is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API