Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of D.A.G.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 15, 1992No. C0-91-530PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

The state appeals from a court of appeals’ decision affirming a trial court order which suppressed evidence on the basis of an unreasonable, warrantless search and seizure, 474 N.W.2d 419. We affirm the decisions of the courts below.

At about 3:45 p.m. on August 30, 1990, Deputy Brian Nielson of the Douglas County Sheriff’s Department contacted Officer Larry Dailey of the Alexandria Police Department regarding information about a large quantity of marijuana at 1002 Hawthorne in Alexandria. Nielson received the information from Thomas Charles Howard, who had appeared at the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. State v. ShrinerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. In Re the Welfare of B.R.K.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. State v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. People v. SandersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API