Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of B.R.K.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 3, 2003No. C7-01-1466PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
After receiving a report of an underage drinking party at a private home, two Chippewa County sheriffs deputies entered and searched the home without obtaining a search warrant. As a result of their search, the deputies found appellant B.R.K. and three other teenagers hiding behind a furnace in the basement. When questioned by the deputies, B.R.K. admitted to consuming alcohol. He also tested positive for alcohol consumption. B.R.K. was subsequently charged with consumption of alcoholic beverages by a minor in violation of Minn.Stat. § 340A.503, subd. 1…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BartyllaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. ShrinerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.