Legal Opinion
Tatum v. Palmer
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice SwepstoN
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The only question raised by the one assignment of error on appeal is whether or not the trial judge was in error in holding that the injured employee, Mrs. Palmer, did not unreasonably refuse a request for a further examination consisting of a myelogram.
T.C.A. sec. 50-1004 provides in part as follows:
“The injured employee must submit himself to the examination by the employer’s physician at all reasonable times if requested to do so by the employer # # #. If the injured employee refuses to comply with any reasonable request for examination or to accept…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Edwards v. Travelers Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WicklineNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- Escobedo v. Agriculture Products Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Holder v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Chapman v. Employers Insurance Co. of AlabamaTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Escobedo v. Agriculture Products Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974