State v. Leverington
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Maria Seibold appeals from a district court order denying her motions for a second amended judgment and to hold Paul Leverington in contempt and denying her request for a hearing on her motions. We conclude the court erred in denying Seibold’s motions without providing her with sufficient time to schedule a hearing. We reverse the court’s order and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] Seibold and Leverington have one child together. In 2006, a judgment was entered finding Leverington is the child’s natural father, awarding Seibold sole legal and physical custody of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Simburger v. SimburgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- DUFNER v. TrottierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Lessard v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State, County of Cass, Ex Rel. Seibold v. LeveringtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. CraigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.