Legal Opinion

State v. Leverington

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2012No. 20110152PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Maria Seibold appeals from a district court order denying her motions for a second amended judgment and to hold Paul Leverington in contempt and denying her request for a hearing on her motions. We conclude the court erred in denying Seibold’s motions without providing her with sufficient time to schedule a hearing. We reverse the court’s order and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] Seibold and Leverington have one child together. In 2006, a judgment was entered finding Leverington is the child’s natural father, awarding Seibold sole legal and physical custody of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Simburger v. SimburgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. DUFNER v. TrottierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Lessard v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State, County of Cass, Ex Rel. Seibold v. LeveringtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Estate of BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. CraigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API