Legal Opinion

State, County of Cass, Ex Rel. Seibold v. Leverington

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2013No. 20130026PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Maria Seibold appealed from a second amended judgment entered after the district court denied her motion to change primary residential responsibility of their minor child from Paul Leverington to her. We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in denying Seibold’s motion to modify primary residential responsibility and did not clearly err in its award of parenting time. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Seibold and Leverington were never married and have one child together, K.S.L., born in 2004. In 2006, a judgment was entered finding Leverington is K.S.L.’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Bertsch v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Larson v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Taylor v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Regan v. LervoldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Bredeson v. MackeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API