Legal Opinion

State v. Nanick

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 1920No. 21,662PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis, Montgomery, J., convicting her of the offense of keeping a disorderly house, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the municipal court of the ' city of Minneapolis convicting her of the offense of keeping a disorderly house.

Whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction is the only question for consideration. The prosecution presented the testimony of two men who were found in the place and of two policemen who made the arrest, one of whom had previously visited the place as a detective. The defendant offered no evidence whatever.

Defendant contends that the evidence does not warrant the conclusion that she was the keeper of the house, nor the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lykken v. VavreckDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
  2. State v. GlennySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. City of St. Paul v. MahmoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Goff v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. State v. GlennySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API