Legal Opinion
Lykken v. Vavreck
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 16, 1973No. 4-71 Civ. 269PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
This is a civil damage action, tried to the court with jury waived, brought under the Civil Rights Law, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for claimed illegal arrest, an unlawful search and seizure, and the violation of other constitutional rights.
The events that give rise to the ease occurred late in the evening on Saturday, May 9, 1970, at the home.of three of the plaintiffs, David and Harriet Lykken and their teenage son Jesse. The other plaintiffs were all guests in the Lykken home that evening. The numerous defendants are members of the Minneapolis Police Department who…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marcus Gumz, Cross-Appellant v. Douglas Morrissette and Lawrence Cloutier, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Bench Billboard Co. v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Fletcher v. O'DONNELLDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Manfredonia v. BarryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- Keker v. ProcunierDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.