State Ex Rel. Goff v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
DIBELL, Justice.
This is an action brought by the state in the district court to abate a nuisance maintained upon certain premises in the city of Minneapolis. There were findings against the defendants. The de fendant Fay appeals from the order denying her motion for a new-trial. The proceeding Aims under 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 10194, et seq. Neither defendant appeared. The defendant Minneapolis Brewing Company does not appeal. The trial court ordered a judgment for the abatement of the premises and property for one year but provided that the penalty of $300 provided by 2 Mason Minn. St.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State ex rel. O'Brien v. TerrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State v. NanickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. PalmerstenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941