Legal Opinion

Richmond v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 25, 1996No. CR 96-34PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

This case was certified to this court by the Court of Appeals because it involved statutory interpretation. Appellant Richard Dalton Richmond contends that a bench warrant served on him which led to the revocation of his three concurrent five-year probated sentences was stale and, therefore, void and of no effect. We affirm.

On February 15, 1989, appellant Richmond pled guilty to counts of burglary, theft of property, and hindering apprehension. In connection with these pleas, he was sentenced to a term of five years’ probation and was required to pay fines, costs, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Carmical v. City of BeebeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Wynn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. D. Hawkins, Inc. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Grayson v. Bank of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Taylor Butry-Weston v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  5. Sherwood v. GloverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API