Carmical v. City of Beebe
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Steele Hays, Justice.
Appellants, Margaret and Marvin Carmical, challenge actions of the White County Circuit Court in dismissing their complaint based on grounds of res judicata and statute of limitations. This is the second time they have appealed to this court, therefore we have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule l-2(a)(ll). We dismissed the first appeal because counterclaims were still pending in the trial court and there was not an appealable order pursuant to ARCP Rule 54(b). Carmical v. City of Beebe, 302 Ark. 339, 789 S.W.2d 453 (1990). We do not reach the merits of this appeal because the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Montgomery v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Bridgman v. DrillingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Ward v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- American Standard, Inc. v. MILLER ENGINEERING, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sparkman Learning Center v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Carmical v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- D. Hawkins, Inc. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Richmond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.