Legal Opinion

In re Pardue

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 12, 2002No. 2002-B-0169PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1270ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

hPER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter arises from a petition for consent discipline filed jointly by respondent, Hobart 0. Pardue, Jr., and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) following the institution of formal charges. For respondent’s misconduct, the parties proposed a six-month period of suspension to run consecutively to the suspension imposed in a prior disciplinary matter. The disciplinary board recommended the joint petition for consent disciphne be accepted.

UNDERLYING FACTS

Respondent was retained as the attorney for the Succession of Lloyd…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. In re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API