Legal Opinion

In re Pardue

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 26, 1999No. 98-B-3017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

LPER CURIAM. *

This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from formal charges instituted by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Hobart O. Pardue, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana. The charges primarily arise from respondent’s conviction for one count of willfully making and subscribing a false tax return.1

UNDERLYING FACTS

On April 6, 1995, respondent pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana to one count of willfully making and subscribing a false tax return in…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MosleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  2. In Re HuckabySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. In re StoutSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re BilbeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. In re GaudinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. In re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  4. In re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API