Legal Opinion

Raye v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 23, 2003No. 1 CA-SA 03-0001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 The question presented is whether a person charged with violating Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 4-244(33) (2002) is entitled to a trial by jury. We hold that this offense, often called “underage drinking and driving,” is not a jury-eligible offense.

¶ 2 Leander D. Raye was twenty years old when cited for violating A.R.S § 4-244(33), which makes it unlawful for “a person under the age of twenty-one years to drive or be in physical control of a motor vehicle while there is any spirituous liquor in the person’s body.” 1 The municipal court denied Raye’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Commonwealth v. HowardKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  5. O'NEILL v. MangumArizona Supreme Court · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JOHN C. v. SargeantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. State v. UrreaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API