State v. Driscoll
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
We granted discretionary review to consider the State’s challenge to a suppression order entered in this prosecution for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The trial court suppressed evidence of defendant Timothy Driscoll’s blood-alcohol test on the ground that the police officer who invoked the implied consent procedures was not authorized to do so. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I. In September 1988, Brian Sanger was hired by the Preston, Iowa police chief as a part-time law enforcement officer. Sanger is a graduate of the Iowa Law Enforcement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Wichita Falls v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Carty v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Buck v. Hawley & HoopsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- State v. SmejkalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Commonwealth v. VaidulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- City of Windsor Heights v. SpanosSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014