Legal Opinion
Harvison v. Charles E. Davis & Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 29, 1992No. 91-286PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
Appellants, James and Maidlene Harvison, appeal an order of the Washington Circuit Court entering summary judgment and dismissing their complaint for conversion, fraud, and legal malpractice against appellees, Charles E. Davis and Associates, Inc., a/k/a Davis & Associates, P.A., Charles E. Davis, and Jeff H. Watson. The Harvisons allege their causes of action arose from Davis’ and Watson’s representation of the Harvisons in the drafting and enforcement of a land sales contract. The Harvisons assert six points of error in the proceedings below, all of which concern…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cordes v. Outdoor Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Reagan v. City of PiggottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Dillard v. Resolution Trust Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Nixon v. H & C Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Pinkston v. LovellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Flentje v. First Nat. Bank of WynneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Renfro v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Reynolds v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Oglesby v. Baptist Medical SystemSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. MosbacherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.