Legal Opinion

Diane O’Neil v. Somatics, LLC and Elektrika, Inc.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided December 1, 2020No. 20-cv-175-PBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Diane O’Neil Case No. 20-cv-175-PB v. Opinion No.

2020 DNH 208

Somatics, LLC and Elektrika, Inc. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER In this diversity action, Diane O’Neil, a New Hampshire resident, has sued two out-of-state corporate defendants, Somatics, LLC and Elektrika, Inc., stemming from injuries she allegedly sustained as a result of electroconvulsive therapy with the Thymatron instrument. Elektrika has moved to dismiss the claims against it for lack of personal jurisdiction. In response, O’Neil contends that she requires jurisdictional…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Multiple Energy Technologies, Plaintiff v. Kymira, Ltd., DefendantDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
  2. Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Kymira, Ltd.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API