Legal Opinion

Multiple Energy Technologies, Plaintiff v. Kymira, Ltd., Defendant

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided February 15, 2023No. 22-cv-209-SMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Multiple Energy Technologies, Plaintiff v. Case No. 22-cv-209-SM Opinion No.

2022 DNH 142

Kymira, Ltd., Defendant O R D E R Multiple Energy Technologies (“MET”) is a Delaware company with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania. It manufactures and sells a bioceramic powder called “Redwave.” It also sells finished textile products manufactured with Redwave directly to consumers. According to MET, bioceramics can be incorporated into garments, sheets, and other textiles and, if implemented correctly, will reflect the wearer’s body…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC v. Alpenrose Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. A Corp. v. All American Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Kymira, Ltd.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API