Legal Opinion
Matter of Electrolux Corporation
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 1942PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.
The question presented for decision upon this appeal is whether the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, which affirmed the decision of the referee that the salesmen of Electrolux Corporation are employees within the meaning of the unemployment insurance law (Labor Law, art. 18; Cons. Laws, ch. 31), is supported by substantial evidence and, therefore, conclusive upon the courts.
The appeal arises in a proceeding initiated by Electrolux Corporation to have • determined its liability under the unemployment insurance law to make contributions with respect to the earnings of its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In Re the Claim of MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Matter of Glielmi v. Netherland Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Matter of Electrolux CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cooke v. DrigantNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Kirby Co. of Bozeman, Inc. v. Employment Security DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Geerdes v. J. R. Watkins Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Trustees of Columbia University v. HerzogAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Matter of Rumsey Manufacturing Corp. (Corsi)New York Court of Appeals · 1947
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.