Legal Opinion

Matter of Hall v. Salvation Army

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.

Claimant has been awarded compensation on account of injuries received while working in the “ industrial home ” maintained by the Salvation Army at 535 West Forty-eighth street, New York city.

We agree with the Appellate Division that workmen employed in carrying on work in the “ home ” come within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and are covered by it provided they are employed- “ under any contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written,” unless they fall within excepted classes not material here. (Workmen’s Compensation Law; Cons. Laws, ch. 67, § 3, group 18, as amd.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Dale v. . Saunders Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Ferro v. Leopold Sinsheimer Estate, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Caughman v. Columbia Y. M. C. A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. Schneider v. Salvation ArmySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Meyers v. Southwest Region Conference Ass'n of Seventh Day AdventistsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. Olivieri v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Hanson v. St. James Hotel & Union City MissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API