Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Hovis

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 27, 2009No. 07-4406PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Faced with competing claims to the proceeds of a $100,000 life insurance policy, Prudential Insurance Company of America filed an interpleader complaint against the claimants, seeking to deposit the disputed sum with the District Court and withdraw from the proceedings. One of the claimants, Robert C. Hovis, then counterclaimed, alleging that Prudential had acted negligently and in bad faith in its handling of the policy changes that led to the dispute. The District Court ruled that the interpleader action was properly brought, and that, because it was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TashireSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Jakimas v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. High Technology Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Robert Lee v. West Coast Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Primerica Life Insurance Co. v. Ila ReidCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. Sevelitte v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
  4. Stonebridge Life Insurance v. KissingerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  5. State Farm Life Insurance Co. v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API