Legal Opinion
Van Ommeren Bulk Shipping, B v. v. Tagship, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 27, 1993No. Civ. 3-92-81 (WWE)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO TRANSFER
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Van Ommeren Bulk Shipping, B.V., (“Van Ommeren”) has filed a complaint containing two causes of action. Count I alleges breach of contract against Tagship Management. Count II alleges conversion against Tagship Management, Tagship, and Richard Tager. Tager filed a counterclaim against Van Ommeren for unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of trade or commerce as proscribed by the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”). This court subsequently granted Commodities Ocean Transport Corporation’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Schieffelin & Co. v. Jack Co. of Boca, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Gibbs & Hill, Inc. v. Harbert International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Combustion Engineering, Inc. v. NEI International Combustion, Ltd.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
- Feigenbaum v. Marble of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- A Slice of Pie Productions, LLC v. Wayans Bros. EntertainmentDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. National Presort, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- Uses Manufacturing, Inc. v. Rocky Mountain InstituteDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Panterra Engineered Plastics, Inc. v. Transportation Sys. Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Jones v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.