Black v. . Commissioners
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The Commissioners of Buncombe County having managed their financial matters so that the county indebtedness for current necessary expenses ofthe county on the 1st day of January, 1901, was $59,037.13, and the court-house not being suited to the wishes of the people and the business of the county, they wished to dispose of the old court-house and build a new one; and having taxed the people and property as high as they could, under the constitutional restriction, the Legislature, on the 11th March, 1901, passed and ratified an act (Acts 1901, Chap. 598) intended to enable the Commissioners to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- State Ex Rel. Tate v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Cain v. Commissioners of Davie CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- McCless v. MeekinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- City of Charlotte v. ShepardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sing v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Palmer v. . Haywood CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Ex parte ModeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Dyer v. City of LeaksvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Glenn v. . Commissioners of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.