Legal Opinion

City of Charlotte v. Shepard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1898PublishedCited by 27 opinions

PETITION by plaintiff to rehear the case between same parties, decided at February Term,' 1897, and reported in 120 N. O. R., 411.

1Opinion of the Court

To make the bonds of a municipal corporation valid and binding as evidence of an indebtedness of such municipality, two things are necessary:

There must be an act of the General Assembly passed and ratified as required by the Constitution, Art. II, sec. 14, authorizing the creation of such debt and the issue of such bonds; and, upon this legislative authority, the proposition to create such debt and to issue bonds thereon must be submitted to the popular vote of the municipality, and must receive the sanction of a majority of the qualified voters at an election held for that purpose.

When this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Ralls County Court v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Commissioners of Stanly County v. SnuggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. R. R. v. . CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Black v. CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  2. Smathers v. Commissioners of Madison CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Commissioners of Wilkes County v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Jones v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Rodman-Heath Cotton Mills v. Town of WaxhawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API