Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Kelso

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 6, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The petition was several times amended upon motions for more specific statement, and as finally perfected, sets up the alleged cause of action substantially as follows: That the defendants Kelso and Ridenour were stock brokers, duly licensed by the secretary of state to carry on such business, and that each had qualified therefor by giving a bond, as required by statute, Chapter 13-B, Title IX, of the Supplemental Supplement to the Code of Iowa, 1915, which bond undertakes that, if the broker therein named ‘ ‘ shall pay any and all fines assessed against him for the wrongful sale of stocks,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. Inhabitants of MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Home Lumber Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Kennedy v. HodgesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Mayo v. MoritzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. People v. ClumMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Midwest Management Corp. v. StephensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Reilly v. ClyneArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Curtis v. MichaelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API