Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1946No. 30613PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The question to be determined is whether a hand which is permanently and totally useless to such an extent that employment is limited to work with the other hand is alost hand within the meaning of the schedule of losses in Section 1465-80, General Code (114 Ohio Laws, 34).

It may here be noted that compensation for temporary total disability or for impairment in earning capacity, such as was received by the relator, does not preclude the right of an employee, in a proper case, to receive further compensation for any loss sustained which is covered by the schedule of losses set out in Section…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Calhoon v. Meridian Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Norwood v. Lake Bisteneau Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Sheanon v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Franko v. William Schollhorn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Maurer v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Gassmann v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Walker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Bosch v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Timmerman Truss, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API