Legal Opinion

E/M Lubricants, Inc. v. Microfral, S. A. R. L.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 20, 1981No. 80 C 3239PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*236MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRADY, District Judge.

This is an action for breach of a license agreement. Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction on the ground that plaintiff fraudulently enticed its representative into the jurisdiction to serve him with process.1 Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). The motion is granted.

Plaintiff E/M Lubricants, Inc. (“E/M”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Lafayette, Indiana, and is engaged in the sale and licensing of patented processes for the treatment of metals. In May of 1979, plaintiff entered into a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Fischer v. KletzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. Endsley v. JohnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Strand v. Librascope, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. SpeakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gladys Allen and J. Patrick Craddock v. Robert FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Tmf Tool Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant, and Jack Joseph and Joseph & Myers, Cross-Appellants v. Hans Muller, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. May Dept. Stores Co. v. WilanskyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995
  5. K Mart Corp. v. Gen-Star Industries Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API