Legal Opinion

Archie G. Strutt v. Frank Urham

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1971No. 25269PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Archie G. Strutt brought this civil rights action for damages against Frank Upham, a police officer employed by Costa Mesa, California. In his amended complaint, Strutt alleged that, acting in his capacity as a police officer, Upham so negligently, corruptly and fraudulently conducted an investigation of certain bad-check charges involving Strutt, that he caused to be filed a false complaint against Strutt, resulting in the latter’s false imprisonment for four months on a charge of violating California Penal Code, section 476a (drawing checks for which there were insufficient funds). The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Anthony G. Notaras v. F. C. Ramon and Jane Doe RamonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maiorana v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  2. Anastasius G. Tritsis v. Ronald BackerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  3. Delone Martin v. J. W. DuffieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. Richardson v. SnowDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  5. Grisom v. LoganDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API