Legal Opinion

Peralta v. Mariea

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Third Judicial District, for the County of Contra Costa. This was an appeal from the District Court, who refused a continuance upon the application of one of the attorneys of plaintiff, whose affidavit set forth, that he was engaged as assistant counsel with Colonel J. K. Irving for plaintiff, and that

1Opinion of the Court

Heydenfeldt, Justice,.delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.

The agreement of counsel in the District Court for a continuance of the cause not having been reduced to writing, could not be regarded by the court, and upon the failure of the plaintiff to appear and prosecute his suit, the court could have taken no other action than it did upon the motion of the defendant.

The point made that the District Court had no jurisdiction, cannot avail the appellant, who was plaintiff below. That would only be an additional reason to sustain the nonsuit.

If the case was improperly in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spence v. State Nat. Bank of El PasoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Colorado Eastern Ry. Co. v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  3. Garza v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API