Legal Opinion

Garza v. Perez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1966No. 196PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPE, Justice.

Appellants’ single point of error asserts that the district court erred in overruling their (defendants’) plea to its jurisdiction over the subject matter of appellees’ (plaintiffs’) suit.

This is a partition suit. The parties are Pedro A. Perez, surviving husband of Margarita P. Perez, deceased, and seven children of their marriage. Pedro A. Perez and three of his children, appellees here, were plaintiffs, and four other children, appellants here, were defendants in the court below. Judgment was rendered, after jury trial, adverse to appellants.

Appellants argue that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kirk v. HeadTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Spence v. State Nat. Bank of El PasoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Washington Bridge Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. WrightTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Wells v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Montgomery v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API