American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Geiger

This is an action to restrain defendant from continuing a strike.

The pertinent facts leading to this controversy may be briefly stated. By letter dated May 24, 1954, defendant informed plaintiff that defendant represented a majority of plaintiff’s employees and that defendant would like to meet with plaintiff *30to negotiate an agreement covering hours, wages and working conditions of those employees. Plaintiff, by letter dated June 1, 1954, replied that it was not in a position to meet with defendant for the purpose of negotiating such an agreement, but that if defendant desired to explain and…