Legal Opinion

37 GAMBLING DEVICES (CHEYENNE ELKS) v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1985No. 83-199PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

The key issue which we address in this case is a claim of exemption from the Wyoming statutes prohibiting gambling, which is premised on the ground that the accused activities consisted of “raffles or bingo conducted by charitable or nonprofit organizations.” The appellants also argue at length a claim that the trial court erred in refusing to take judicial notice of the claimed fact that the Elk’s Lodge is a nonprofit organization. The district court ruled that certain accused machines, devices and paraphernalia were either gambling devices per se or used for gambling,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Mentock v. MentockWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. HudsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. United States v. John Terrance Garcia, Phillip G. JackmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Armijo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hurst v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ogle v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Harris v. Missouri Gaming CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. Walter v. MooreWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hance v. StraatsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API