Legal Opinion

Atlantic Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 1965No. 292PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The Federal Trade Commission has found that an agreement between the Atlantic Refining Company (Atlantic) and the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear), under which the former “sponsors” the sale of the tires, batteries and accessory (TBA) products of the latter to its wholesale outlets and its retail service station dealers, is an unfair method of competition in violation of *360§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 719, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 45 (1964 ed.).1 Under the plan Atlantic sponsors the sale of Goodyear products to its wholesale and retail outlets on an overall…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation v. Diversified Packaging CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API