Legal Opinion

Oler v. Supervised Estate of Huckleberry

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1987No. 67A-04-8607-CV-195PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Dale Oler appeals the trial court’s denial of his Trial Rule 60(B) Motion for Relief From Judgment. Oler’s counsel had failed to respond to a summary judgment motion and failed to appear at the hearing. However, the original date for the hearing had been advanced by 30 days and Oler’s counsel claimed he was not notified. Oler argues lack of notice because of faulty pro*350cess and the resulting absence of Oler’s attorney through no fault of the party constitute excuseable neglect under T.R. 60(B)(1) and the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion. We agree and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boles v. WeidnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Burton R. Raughley v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Jones v. Uris Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Graham v. SchreiferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Fulton v. Van SlykeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of RansomIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Sears v. BlubaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Smith v. PatelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Altman v. AltmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. Altman v. AltmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API