Legal Opinion

Smith v. Patel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1990No. 44A03-9001-CV-10PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Judge.

The Small Claims Division set aside a default judgment entered by it some ten weeks before and the plaintiff, Smith, appeals.

It appears from the record that Smith received a check from UMA Corporation that was twice returned for insufficient funds when he attempted to negotiate it. The check was signed by Narotam J. Patel and no designation appeared indicating that he signed only in a representative capacity. Thus, Smith sued Patel in the Small Claims Division of LaGrange Superior Court.

On July 27, 1989, the day set for trial, Patel did not appear and Smith's attorney secured a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. KerwinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Potts v. CastilloIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Oler v. Supervised Estate of HuckleberryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. All Season Exteriors, Inc. v. RandleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Linda Rosenberg v. Kenneth RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Penrod v. Car Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API