Legal Opinion

State v. Stenstrom

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2017No. 27790PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Chief Justice

[¶1.] Lee Ann Stenstrom appeals her termination from the drug-court program and subsequent revocation of suspension of execution of a four-year sentence. Sten-strom argues the drug court 1 violated her statutory and constitutional rights to due process and counsel by denying her request to permit her attorney to attend drug-court-team meetings. She also argues her termination from the drug-court program was error. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶2.] Stenstrom was initially arrested on July 1, 2014, in connection with a law-enforcement investigation into possible drug dealing at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. MacKaben v. MacKabenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. DivanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. SchwallerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Dale v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SharpfishSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Stoebner v. KonradSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. KariSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Wright v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Wright v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API