State v. Stenstrom
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Chief Justice
[¶1.] Lee Ann Stenstrom appeals her termination from the drug-court program and subsequent revocation of suspension of execution of a four-year sentence. Sten-strom argues the drug court 1 violated her statutory and constitutional rights to due process and counsel by denying her request to permit her attorney to attend drug-court-team meetings. She also argues her termination from the drug-court program was error. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶2.] Stenstrom was initially arrested on July 1, 2014, in connection with a law-enforcement investigation into possible drug dealing at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- MacKaben v. MacKabenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. DivanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. SchwallerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Dale v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SharpfishSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Stoebner v. KonradSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. KariSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Wright v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Wright v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.