Legal Opinion

In Re Marks

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1969No. Crim. 12822PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

This is an application for writ of habeas corpus on behalf of Richard Marks (hereinafter called petitioner), currently confined in the California Rehabilitation Center (hereinafter called CRC) under an order of commitment as a narcotics addict. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 3051.)

We are called upon to resolve, in effect, a jurisdictional dispute between the State of California’s narcotics addict rehabilitation program and that of Synanon, a well-known privaté rehabilitation organization. The principal issue is whether the state may impose its antinarcotic testing requirements on those of its…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. People v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re ByeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Re TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. In re WalkeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API