In re Walkee
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
This is a companion case to In re Marks, ante, p. 31 [77 Cal.Rptr. 1, 453 P.2d 441], also decided this day. With one crucial exception, the contentions are the same as those raised in Marks and are without merit for the reasons there stated. The exception, a challenge to the validity of the initial commitment for narcotics addiction, is meritorious and requires issuance of the writ of habeas corpus.
The present application was filed on behalf of Alyce Mae Walker (hereinafter called petitioner), currently confined in the California Rehabilitation Center under an order of-com*56mitment as a “civil”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In re RanerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- In re CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In re JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Hittle v. Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. SUPERIOR COURT (WHITLEY)California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Jones v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.