Legal Opinion

Tully v. Scheu

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 18, 1980No. Civ. A. 77-2551PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DEBEVOISE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the motion of petitioner, John Patrick Tully, for an order granting his application for a writ of habeas corpus. On September 26, 1979 the cause was remanded to this Court by the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit with a direction to grant the writ “unless the State of New Jersey affords [Tully] a meaningful sentence reduction hearing within a reasonable time”. After the remand, proceedings were held in the New Jersey courts, but it is my opinion that they did not constitute a meaningful sentence reduction hearing as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Anthony Correale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  3. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Raymond Scotland and St. Clair Springette. Appeal of St. Clair SpringetteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Nathan H. Cohen v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ramallo v. RenoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  2. Tully v. ScheuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Tully v. ScheuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API