Legal Opinion
Ramallo v. Reno
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 27, 1996No. Civil Action 95-01851 (CRR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court in the above-captioned case are the parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Also before the Court are the defendants’ Motion to Strike, Motion for Leave to File a Surreply, and Motion for Protective Order. Upon consideration of the pleadings, the entire record herein, the law applicable thereto, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court shall deny the parties’ Motions for Summary Judgment. The Court also shall declare moot the defendants’ Motion to Strike, grant the defendants’ Motion for Leave to File…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- OAO Alfa Bank v. Center for Public IntegrityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1998
- General Electric Co. v. BrownerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Medley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026